|
hey have you guys heard of birth
control?... well i think it is the time for "us" to consider this issue
seriousely!!! why.... well just think of this.. more people more demands,
more people more problems, more problems will inccur more problems...
so problems must come from something.. and that "something" is us..the
human ... hey hey... got the idea!!! people ... look at singapore for
example they have a good amount of population and so that factor enables
their gov. manage things easier! whether you are agree or not argree with
me but please save the forest ... ortherwise we will not have air to breath....
and do remember that the forests were here before us.!!!! oh and for those
who doesn't have any faintess idea about forest, i sugguest you to go
for a hinking trip in the forest and you will appreciate the word "forest
more" hahaha tik tok jao na li ca
pit@minyos.its.rmit.edu.au
from metabelis.rmit.edu.au on
Tuesday, June 24, 1997 at 16:27:01
NOEL my mistake the date was MAY
28,1997. sorry. my page is just up above: (I think)?
noelnancy @ netbridge.net
from modem44.netbridge.net on
Thursday, May 29, 1997 at 11:46:09
May 38,1997 First of all my name
is Noel and I care about the environment. First of all People should learn
learn to get along with the Wildlife & adapt to the environment and it's
natural habitats, not by building big cities by creating distruction in
their path every where they go by the way technalogy is created. People
have been on this planet for centuries, the natives (other cultures),
they have been doing fine with-in the environment until another culture;race
forced them to live/learn their ways of being domestic,teachings of law,destructive
paths. You and everyone else out their knows about History but in the
form where you sometimes may not see it in a clear way/form and so you
& no one else will relize how to make up for what our history upon the
whole world did with the technalogy for senseless stupidity domestic wars,
whole way of life changed things. Wild animals in the rainforests, jungles
etc. have been able to live for survival like any other creature would
except for us,people have used to live in the wild like all otheer living
things except now every body almost the whole freaken world is domesticated
because of what power to control people so now wev'e got this entirely
new more comlicated and complex law of "so called social living" of a
domestic life people think it's free well this is not reall life reall
life is to be out away from it all out in the wilderness where theirs
no hassle of any of these all kinds of extras domestic problems or power
over one another,it's become so disgusting,despise of arrogance I have
ever seen all other cultures fighted for their will their rights their
race whole way of life living away from a domestic life to be able to
travel freely with out certain rules that go by Government law cause they
didn't need any their social life was totally different the way they were
set up their whole existence was based on the true way of living in the
environment. Now every one has lost that over what domestic power of of
destruction over ignorance!! "pathetic" Cars=pollution drugs=bad health
stores=overpopulation,littering,wiping out recources. Machinary=faster
devastation,destruction,pollution etc. all these things lead to in the
same catagories of destruction in one form and in many others they all
relate to each one another including NUCLEAR POWER PLANT you or 1 another
said leads to NUCLEAR WASTE man made stuff was never intended to stay
or hold together stay in one form or another they'll always be disasters
to the causes of people from pollution,destruction except we can stop
that in which we will be able to get along with nature people have broken
THE CHHAIN, BARRIER, CYCLE OF LIFE Destruction & Creation are =. but not
in this case people are doing harm in which ways the tools are more too
destructive hazardes to use so get rid of that kind of technology. Written
in ? finished 9:23pm by an 8th grader made to look like an (who knows)
:old wise person,100,000 yrs old "before people start relizing"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!................,,,,,,,,,,,,,,/////////////''''''"""""""""""""""""""
"Oh please" email me cause I could sure use some help""
noelnancy & netbridge.net
from modem44.netbridge.net on
Thursday, May 29, 1997 at 11:38:58
Please visit Suratthani rainforest
http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/5578/
http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/5578/
from surat.loxinfo.co.th on Tuesday,
May 20, 1997 at 13:06:13
Stop the pollution in Thailand! Start
do LIVE TOGETHER with the nature! Like many years ago, when no farang
was in Thailand! Lock all the SEXTOURISTS! And LEGALIZE GANCHA the power
of this plant is the Natural Mystic and it's a MEDICINE!!! Don't run to
the doctor for headach, smoke a joint and the pain will go!
ruler@swix.ch
from ppp213.swix.ch on Thursday,
May 01, 1997 at 17:46:04
I think building dam for electricity
is such a cheap action. Nuclear power plant is definitely my choice.
Pradermchai Ponlawan
/ lum@wavetech.net from
neptune.pegasus.cranfield.ac.uk on Sunday, April 20, 1997 at 05:33:17
ป่าไม้ให้ขุดอุโมงค์ลอดอุทยา1ภูซาง
อธิบดีกรมชลประทา1 เ*ย"กรมป่าไม้"ยอมให้ ขุดอุโมงค์*ั11้ำ*่า1 *x้1ที่อุทยา1แห่งชาติภูซาง
*ะเยา แล้ว แต่ขอทำความเข้าใจกับ1ักอ1ุรักษ์ก่อ1 ยx1ยั1โครงการ1ี้ มี*ลกระทบส่งแวดล้อม1้อย
ไม่มีการสร้างเขx่อ1 ไม่มีการย้ายค1 1ายรุ่งเรxอง จุลชาติ อธิบดีกรมชลประธา1
เปิดเ*ยถึงกร3ีที่ไจก้าได้หยุดทำการศึกษาโครงการ*ั11้ำ จาก กก-อิง-1่า1 เ1x่องจากโครงการดังกล่าว
ต้องดำเ1ิ1การขุดเจาะอุโมงค์ *่า1*x้1ที่อุทยา1แห่งชาติภูซาง จ.*ะเยา เ*ราะเกรงจะเกิด*ลกระทบต่อสิ่งแวดล้อม1ั้1
ว่าได้เข้า*บ และปรึกษาหารxอกับ 1ายสถิตย์ สวิ1ทร อธิบดีกรมป่าไม้ แล้ว เ*x่อชี้แจงและเส1อข้อเท็จจริงของการก่อสร้าง
โครงการดังกล่าวว่ามีความจำเป็1เช่1ไร แม้ว่าจะต้อง*่า1*x้1ที่อุทยา1แห่งชาติ
แต่ก็ไม่ได้ส่ง*ลกระทบอะไร ประเด็1ที่ไม่ส่ง*ลกระทบ เ1x่องจากว่าอุโมงค์ที่*ั11้ำจากแม่1้ำอิง
ที่จะส่งไปเ*x่อการชลประทา1 และเ*x่ออุปโภค บริโภค 1ั้1จะต้องเจาะลึกลงไปใ1ดิ1
ไม่ใช่ขุดเ*x่อใช้*x้1ห1้าดิ1เ*ียงเล็ก1้อยเท่า1ั้1 ซึ่งอธิบดีกรมป่าไม้
หลังจากรับทราบก็เข้าใจถึงความตั้งใจ และความจำเป็1ของโครงการ1ี้ และระบุว่า
ไม่มีปัญหาอะไรที่กรมชลประทา1 จะขุดเจาะอุโมงค์*่า1*x้1ที่อุทยา1แห่งชาติ
ที่อยู่ใ1เขตความรับ*ิดชอบของกรมป่าไม้ อธิบดีกรมชลประทา1 กล่าวว่าแม้กรมป่าไม้
จะเข้าใจถึงโครงการดังกล่าวดี แต่ต1ต้องให้กลุ่มอ1ุรักษ์เกิดความเข้าใจเช่1กั1
ว่าโครงการ1ี้ แม้จะ*่า1*x้1ที่ที่เป็1เขตอุทยา1แห่งชาติ กรมชลประทา1 ก็จะไม่ทำให้เกิดปัญหาที่เป็1*ลกระทบต่อสิ่งแวดล้อม
เ*ราะจากที่ไจก้า ศึกษาเบx้องต้1เห็1ว่าโครงการ1ี้เป็1โครงการที่ดี มี*ลกระทบต่อสิ่งแวดล้อม1้อยกว่า
โครงการ*ั21าแหล่ง1้ำอx่1ๆ จุดที่มี*ลกระทบ1้อย1ั้1 เ*ราะไม่มีการก่อสร้างเขx่อ1ข1าดใหญ่
ไม่มีการอ*ย*ยราษฎร และยังมีความเป็1ไปได้ทั้งทางด้า1เทค1ิค และทางเศรษฐกิจ
ข3ะเดียวกั1ยังเป็1โครงการที่มีศักยภา*สูง สามารถแก้ปัญหาการขาดแคล11้ำใ1ฤดูแล้งได้
อีกทั้งรัฐบาลได้กำห1ดรายชx่อโครงการ*ั11้ำกก-อิง-1่า1 ไว้ใ1แ*1การดำเ1ิ1การ*ั21าแหล่ง1้ำใ1แ*1ที่
8 แล้ว ซึ่งโครงการ1ี้จะเริ่มดำเ1ิ1การได้ใ1ปี 2543 อ1ึ่งสำหรับการขุดอุโมงค์ส่ง1้ำที่มีการระบุว่าจะต้อง*่า1*x้1ที่อุทยา1แห่งชาติภูซาง
จ.*ะเยา 1ั้1 *x้1ที่ดังกล่าว กรมป่าไม้ ยังไม่ได้ออกประกาศให้เป็1เขตอุทยา1แห่งชาติ
กรุงเท*ธุรกิจรายวั1 28 /3/40
seub@internet.ksc.net.th
from proxy.ksc.net.th on Friday,
March 28, 1997 at 21:47:33
Well, it is not only in Thailand
that we, humankind, destroy everything we could ? It seems to be true
that we are very dangerous species and troublesome. In fact, there is
no free lunch, if Thai people need something to be done then do it, but
be concern for the long run. Be thoughtful, think hard ! Is it worth ?
Is it waste ? Or is it benefiting someone ? I am not taking side because
I am not an expert on environmental stuff. If there may be the better
way out, then the gov't should take some action. I therefore want the
gov't to think harder because this is a very big decision to make, think
of the profit in the long run. and our next generation and another species
beside human because they are also have the right to live and remain there.
We, human, have done so many selfish thing already.
staptara@ix.netcom.com
from cust114.max6.denver.co.ms.uu.net
on Friday, December 20, 1996 at 13:42:34
Well, don't your guys ever play simcity.
Power is everything. We've got to find a way to create power(electricity).
I am in for the nuclear power to save rain forrest.
nxt9@po.cwru.edu
from 198.30.10.243 on Wednesday,
December 11, 1996 at 23:45:22
In response to the last comment,
you can get more info to these questions (Thai version): Are there really
any valuable trees left at the dam site? Will there be significant power
producing capability? Can the dam prevent flooding? Why was it necessary
for the out-going government to approve the project 6 months before the
required environment study was completed? at here
yujira
from esys10297.esys.cwru.edu on Tuesday, December 10, 1996 at 03:35:47
Personelly, I think if we look at
the problem from both sides,we'll understand what people are thinking
about.There've been a lot talkings about the number regarding theexisting
rain forest. Frankly, I've hardly heard about what'sgoing on from EGAT
on the demand of electrical power in Thailand andthe reasons why we should
build dams. If there's someone froma relevant organizations can present
this information, that should be helpful.Well, as far as I know, dams
cannot produce as much amount ofpower as other plants do. But then this
is the issue of weighingbetween pros and cons of the amount of power gained
and the lossof 'green areas' (notice I didn't use the word rain forest
becauseI didn't know if thhe Kang Sua Ten area is still considered arain
forest as most of you claim or not since I haven't beenthere. I hope most
of you who claim have seen the sight before.)I think if what you claim
is true, be careful using the Internetnext time because every minute spent
on the Internet could meanripping a leaf of trees away from the forest.
from gray.engin.umich.edu on
Wednesday, December 04, 1996 at 22:01:52
By the truth, I have no idea how
can we solve this problem.The problem is that we need more power. As I
can thinkof only wind mill, solar cell and dam, that will not createthe
polution when it is operate. Wind mill normally will notproduce much power.
Solar cell has the same problem, plushigh cost. Dam is good but some forest
is gone. The pointis that the problem will be solve if we can reduce the
amountof wasting energy or we have a new way of producing the power.Anyone
has any idea how to solve this problem, let me know also.I really want
to know how to handle this. Should we go for Nuclearpower plant which
create dangerous waste but can be control?Or should we stop using the
Internet to save power?
kxt15@po.cwru.edu
from 129.22.5.250 on Wednesday,
December 04, 1996 at 09:47:51
You 've done a good job.. Keep it
up !!!
from junior.cqu.edu.au on Thursday,
November 21, 1996 at 07:56:58
I am a vegetarian, not for guilt
trip animal rights , but I was reading long ago about the horror that
the meat production for human consumption cost the planet... You get only
1 pound of animal protein for 16 pounds of grain protein fed to the animal
and it is doubted that more than 50 % of animal protein can be digested
by humans , cows produce one third of the atmospheric methane pollution
and are responsible for the companies need to kill rain forest , there
are many other negative results of the meat production for human consumption...
The really sad thing is that it is no more necessary for human health
than smoking cigarretts... I am one of the healthiest people I know and
have consumed no meat products for 15 years ! and no I don't think fish
is a plant ! ,
ceolwynn@mindspring.com
from ip227.raleigh2.nc.interramp.com
on Sunday, November 17, 1996 at 09:26:43
Here's a few rainforest fact quoted
from here
"200
million indigenous people depend directly on the rain forest for food
and shelter.
At current rate
of destruction in 37 years the rain forests will be GONE!
Rain forests cover
only 2% percent of the Earth's surface but rain forests house over 50%
percent of the Earth's species.
Over 50% percent
of original acreage has been cut down. "
6 species are
lost to extinction every hour. 50 million acres are being cut down each
year. This is the size of England, Scotland & Wales combined.
2.4 acres are
being cut down each second. This is the size of two football fields.
25% of medicines
owe their existence to plants. 70% of plants useful in cancer treatment
are found only in the rainforest. 99% of rain forest plants have not yet
been thoroughly examined for their medicinal properties.
Burning of rain
forests is the second largest factor contributing to the greenhouse effect.
55 square feet
of rain forest is destroyed for each quarter pounder of fast food hamburger.
400 million quarter pound hamburgers are made from rain forest beef each
year.
One of the world's
largest destroyers of rain forests: Mitsubishi (cars, electronics, Kirin
Beer, Nikon cameras, Bank of California, etc.) " ...
If you really want to worry check
out population
crisis. Take a peak at your future window... It ain't a pretty
picture. - PuTT
putt@eskimo.com
from ts28-15.homenet.ohio-state.edu
on Thursday, October 17, 1996 at 01:00:16
|
